Also you have some very mixed lighting going on which doesn't help the cause. This also isn't much of a test if you don't try to match the footage. In contrast, the GH4 seems a bit too saturated and tends to be rather yellow/orangy. To my taste the A6000 footage is too bright/washed out, too desaturated/flat, too magenta/blue. My feedback would be the same as the peepz above and prefer the GH4 in this particular 'test'. If you're gonna show it to the whole wide world and want to be as accurate as possible, whatever that means, then what you think 'looks nice' may indeed not be all that likeable to your general targeted audience. Color IS subjective and as long as you end up with something you like and that's what matters, then that's what matters. We get sidetracked and offended by these little things a little easily.ДЄctually Andrew is quite right. Seems like everybody is still a little hungover from all the eggnog. But if that's not what you have in mind, with this site, I respect that and will only ready our articles and keep my posts to a minimum. Again, if we're on a journey together I want to stay, I'M SORRY. I don't want to stay anywhere where someone thinks I'm out to get them or make them look bad. Matt was a tad disrespectful, but I think his actions should count for something, which is, like me, he pays you a compliment every day by spending time on your site. I'm here because you're INSIGHTFUL 95% of the time. It IS all subjective! I took extra careВ to write that this is subjective and it might be 'in my head'. EVEN if your profile was 'wrong', so what? What blogger should I go to instead? I like what you have to say, Andrew. Why would I want to undermine you? I thought we were discovering this stuff together-all of usВ here? This postВ ASKS a question. I recommend your site to other filmmakers. I'm not trying to draw you into taking the blame for anything. Again I won't be drawn into taking the blame for profiles or colour-paths you happen to take a dislike to, when it's purely your subjective taste at play.

The A6000 looks absolutely dreadful in your video and you're saying the GH4 is off? Looks fine to me. If I want a 'fuller' look, then BlackmagicВ is very hard to beat. I find them very pleasing (much better than G6, GH3, etc) but for the 'documentary-ish' style I gravitate towardВ I also like the more neutral/clinical feel relative to Canikon and Samsung colours (and of course relative to the A7S they are exceptional!).

It's one of the main reasons I finally took the plunge and got one. I see the issues with GH4 skin tones - they are decent but they don't have that Canon/NikonВ 'special sauce.' In general though I really like the GH4's colours (and the GX7/GM1). Black Diffusion 1/2 (0.5) was my main choice. I've just boughtВ a couple of Tiffen non-warm diffusion filters that are great for dealing with the OTT skin detail and slight digital sharpness of the GH4's 4K. Warm Black Diffusion orВ Warm Soft FX).В Personally I'd stick to the lower strengths ('1' or below) to avoid flare/glow from light sources. The other thing you could try is some flavour of Tiffen warm diffusion filter (e.g. I find colours get ugly if they are too strong in-camera, but can be lifted in post pretty well (as long as the sensor got enough light). IВ keep saturation at -2 or lower, particularly when using Cine D. In a nutshell, don't touch the master pedestal! Also have aВ read of Noam Kroll's GH4 blog post here. don't use Andrew's profiles I think he wrote that guide very early, when James Miller's settings were still de rigueur.В I've based mine around this guy's settings here. I sometimes even add two!ДЄlso,В to put it bluntly. It was made for the GH3 but it solves the GH4's well-documented orange-for-red problem pretty damn well I find: В It can beВ pretty subtle so I'd use it between 70-100% strength.

Try this guy's 'CBLHUE' LUT ('Yak'В 3rd post down).

Sony vegas pro 9 fix ornage skin hue